The Bunker Blog

These tough economic times create real challenges for all of us in the loss prevention industry. Many retailers are closing doors, meaning lost jobs, including loss prevention jobs. Those in the industry who are still working are, in most cases, being asked to do more with less.

With retailers looking to cut costs, loss prevention programs can be viewed as non-essential, and therefore be either cut back or altogether cut from the budget. Retailers are looking to save money where ever possible, and loss prevention is in a position to either show real savings through shrink reduction or face cutbacks in many cases.

One would think that the increase in criminal activity against retailers would secure a position for loss prevention professionals at every retailer, but this may not be the case.

SecurityInfoWatch.com posted an article by Mark Doyle of Jack Hayes, Intl today that summarizes the latest Annual Retail Theft Survey. Not surprisingly, the survey found that overall apprehensions were up 10.8% over 2006, and recoveries were up 9.73%. What was surprising was that the average case value was actually slightly down, at -0.33%.

According to a survey conduct by Aberdeen Research back in October 07, 60% of retailers reported shrink of 1.75% or more for that year. And friends, that’s where the real bang for the buck exists. Having an increase in cases is great, and indeed does help to reduce shrink. But if the shrink percent is high, then something is not working.

This same survey also found that retailers see four major challenges when it comes to their shrink reduction strategies. They are listed below in order of importance:

1. Lack of Employee Training On Loss Prevention Procedures
2. High Incidence of Internal Theft
3. Store Location Demographics (Crime Rates, etc.)
4. Organized Retail Crime

You’ll notice that the top challenge or concern is training. If associate awareness is low, shrink will be high. Loss Prevention must go beyond the weekly meetings and become intimately involved in the LP training in stores. That means one on one, personal training of key employees who will pass along the information and help to build a culture of awareness.

Next on the list is Internal Theft. Since 40 – 50% of shrink is attributed to employee theft or fraud, it only makes sense to put the investigative focus in this area. Shoplifters are a problem, but not THE problem in most locations. The biggest issue employers face when it comes to losses is the fact that up to 30% of their employees are stealing from them at any given time.

Store location issues are a tough problem. I recommend regular risk assessments. That means going to the local police department and requesting property crime statistics. For about $10.00, you get a great deal of information that, along with your specific shrink results, will help you customize your strategy for shrink reduction. I also recommend networking with other local Loss Prevention departments and sharing information about habitual offenders, high theft items, etc. Together, this information can really make a difference in how you protect your merchandise.

Finally, retailers are concerned about organized retail crime. There seems to be some debate in loss prevention circles as to just how much of a problem this is. On one hand, there are those who maintain that ORC is a huge contributor to retail shrink, and that the answer is to work with law enforcement to go after the leaders.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that, if proper training, awareness, and protection standards are in place, ORC is a minimal issue because the boosters are being stopped before they can seriously impact shrink.

Both sides make good arguments, and I think it will take some time before we see which approach makes the biggest impact on the problem.

So, loss prevention professionals face tough challenges in tough economic times. My goal here is to share the “big picture” concerns of retailers in general so that LP professionals can manage their workload and focus to make the biggest impact possible on the shrink in their stores, markets, etc.

But we also have to be keenly aware of what our companies’ specific goals, challenges, and concerns are. At the end of the day, it’s about the shrink. If you catch 1000 shoplifters and dishonest employees, but your shrink remains high and unchanged, then the focus needs to be re-assessed.

So, how about it? Do you agree? Disagree? Want to add your own thoughts? Please leave a comment so we can discuss.

Popularity: 21% [?]